Publications

2023

Hämäläinen, L., Binns, G.E., Hart, N.S., Mappes, J., McDonald, P.G., O'Neill, L., Rowland, H.M., Umbers, K.D.L., Herberstein, M.E. Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad097 

Kikuchi, D.W., Allen, W.L., Arbuckle, K., Aubier, T.G., Briolat, E.S., Burdfield-Steel, E.R., Cheney, K.L., Daňková, K., Elias, M., Hämäläinen, L., Herberstein, M.E., Hossie, T.J., Joron, M., Kunte, K., Leavell, B.C., Lindstedt, C., Lorioux Chevalier, U., McClure, M., McLellan, C.F., Medina, I., Nawge, V., Páez, E., Pal, A., Pekár, S., Penacchio, O., Raška, J., Reader, T., Rojas B., Rönkä, K.H., Rößler, D.C., Rowe, C. Rowland, H.M., Roy, A., Schaal, K.A., Sherratt, T.N., Skelhorn, J., Smart, H.R., Stankowich, T., Stefan, A.M., Summers, K., Taylor, C.H., Thorogood, R., Umbers, K., Winters, A.E., Yeager, J. & Exnerová, A. (2023). The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14192 



    2022

Binns, G.E., Hämäläinen, L., Kemp, D.J., Rowland, H.M., Umbers, K.D.L., Herberstein, M.E. (2022). Additive genetic variation, but not temperature, influences warning signal expression in Amata nigriceps moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiinae). Ecology and Evolution. 12, e9111. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9111 


   Mulá, C., Thorogood, R., & Hämäläinen, L. (2022). Social information use about novel aposematic prey depends on the intensity of the observed cue. Behavioral Ecology. 4, 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac046



    2021

   Hämäläinen, L., Rowland, H.M., Mappes, J., & Thorogood, R. (2021). Social information use by predators: Expanding the information ecology of prey defences. Oikos. e08743. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08743 


   Hämäläinen, L., Hoppitt, W., Rowland, H.M., Mappes, J., Fulford, A.J., Sosa, S., & Thorogood, R. (2021). Social transmission in the wild can reduce predation pressure on novel prey signals. Nature Communications. 12, 3978. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24154-0 


2020

Teichmann, M., Thorogood, R., & Hämäläinen, L. (2020). Seeing red? Colour biases of foraging birds are context dependent. Animal Cognition. 23: 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01407-x 


Hämäläinen, L., & Thorogood, R. (2020). The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience. Philosophical Transactions B. 375: 20190473. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0473 


Hämäläinen, L., Mappes, J, Rowland, H.M., Teichmann, M., & Thorogood, R. (2020). Social learning within and across predator species facilitates the evolution of aposematic prey. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89: 1153–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13180 


Hämäläinen, L., Mappes, J., Thorogood, R., Valkonen, J., Karttunen, K., Salmi, T., & Rowland, H.M. (2020). Predators’ consumption of unpalatable prey does not vary as a function of bitter taste perception. Behavioral Ecology. 31: 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz199 


2019

Hämäläinen, L., Rowland, H.M., Mappes, J., & Thorogood, R. (2019). The effect of social information from live demonstrators compared to video playback on blue tit foraging decisions. PeerJ. 7, e7998. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7998 


Hämäläinen, L., Mappes, J, Rowland, H.M., & Thorogood, R. (2019). Social information use about novel aposematic prey is not influenced by a predator's previous experience with toxins. Functional Ecology. 33: 1982–1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13395 


2017

Hämäläinen, L., Rowland, H.M., Mappes, J., & Thorogood, R. (2017). Can video playback provide social information for foraging blue tits? PeerJ. 5, e3062. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3062 


2016

Chargé, R., Wedell, N., Lindstedt, C., Hämäläinen, L., Övermark, E., & Mappes, J. (2016). Variation in male fertility in a polymorphic moth, Parasemia plantaginis. Animal Behaviour. 111: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.10.014 


2015

Hämäläinen, L., Valkonen, J., Mappes, J., & Rojas, B. (2015). Visual illusions in predator–prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch. Animal Cognition. 18: 1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0874-0